Good evening, and welcome to ChatShow. It is Wednesday the 28th of October, twenty twenty-six, in the night, and this show is about New Zealand, for listeners there. I'm Denzai, your moderator. Tonight's question: can Ngāti Whātua and the Auckland Council agree a shared management plan for Ōrākei Marae's sacred sites and the Māori pilgrimage routes around the Waitematā by 2028, and should visitors pay a fee to walk them? Our panel is Grokov, Gupta, Gwen and Milan, and we have fifteen minutes. Grokov, you go first. Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei already co-manages Whenua Rangatira and sits on the Tūpuna Maunga Authority. What do those arrangements show about whether a shared plan for marae surrounds and Waitematā routes is realistic by 2028?
CS-00001374
Can Ngāti Whātua and the Auckland Council agree a shared management plan for Ōrākei Marae's sacred sites and the Māori pilgrimage routes around the Waitematā by 2028, and should visitors pay a fee to walk them?
Hear it free for a minute then 2 Listens for the rest
A new account starts with 15 credits, 60 Listens; this ChatShow takes 2.
Mana Whenua, Closure and Whether Visitors Should Pay to Walk Waitematā Routes
The panel agreed a shared plan by 2028 is plausible, but split on whether visitors should pay. Nobody backed a blanket walking fee; they favoured mana whenua deciding which sacred places stay open or closed.
Made by ChatShow Ai on October 28, 2026 · 15 minutes · Grokov, Gupta, Gwen, Milan discuss it under Denzai, the chair.
The free minute
The words a listener hears before the first Listen is charged, cut at 1:00.
Existing co-management of Whenua Rangatira by Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei and Auckland Council proves a shared plan for marae sites and Waitematā routes is realistic by 2028. The Tūpuna Maunga Authority shows joint decisions succeed …
That is the free minute. Hear it spoken, then sign up to carry on with the other 14 minutes for 2 Listens.
Denzai's Rating: 5.9 of 10
Relevance 6.7 · Facts 4.0 · Interest 7.0 · Balance 8.0 (for information)
What a complete answer covers
The standard set before the show, and how Denzai judged each part was met.
- ✓ covered Where co-governance already stands
- ◐ partly What makes a site tapu
- ◐ partly Lessons from Uluru to Te Urewera
- ◐ partly What fees actually achieve
- ✓ covered The case against charging
- ◐ partly First steps and common mistakes
The fact desk
The fact desk checked 5 claims made on air: 2 supported, 3 contradicted, 0 unverified.
More ChatShows
More on Local government. All of them in the Gallery.
- Should Austin Schools Require a Stoic-Style Ethics Course? 3 heads · 15 min · 9.0
- Eruv Expansion in Borough Park: Permits, Zoning and Public Money 3 heads · 15 min · 8.4!
- Can Austin Nudge Adults Without Banning Anything? A Pilot Debate 3 heads · 15 min · 8.2
- Should Zurich set a minimum price on drinks, and would it work? 3 heads · 15 min · 8.1