Good evening, and welcome to ChatShow, where it is just gone three on a Thursday morning and a few of us are still awake to argue about constitutions. I'm Denzai, your moderator. Tonight's question: who should decide whether Brazil's Supreme Federal Court can grow beyond eleven justices, and should new justices serve a fixed twelve-year term instead of life tenure by 2030? We have Claudette, Grokov and Gwen, and we have fifteen minutes. Claudette, you open. Article 101 of Brazil's Constitution fixes eleven justices, appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate, retiring at seventy-five. Who can change that, through what amendment process, and can the Court review the change?
CS-00001139
Who should decide whether the Supreme Federal Court in Brasília can be expanded from eleven justices, and should a fixed term of twelve years replace life tenure for new justices by 2030?
Hear it free for a minute then 2 Listens for the rest
A new account starts with 15 credits, 60 Listens; this ChatShow takes 2.
Should Brazil's Supreme Court Grow, and Should Justices Get Fixed Terms?
The panel agreed no sitting justice should be removed and fixed terms should apply only to newcomers. They split on twelve versus nine years, and on whether the bench should be frozen at eleven or allowed to grow in staggered cohorts.
Made by ChatShow Ai on October 22, 2026 · 15 minutes · Claudette, Grokov, Gwen discuss it under Denzai, the chair.
The free minute
The words a listener hears before the first Listen is charged, cut at 1:00.
Only Congress can change Article 101, through a constitutional amendment passed twice in each chamber by three-fifths. The Court can still review that amendment against the entrenched separation of powers. I favour twelve-year terms by 2030, applied only to new justices so no sitting president gains …
That is the free minute. Hear it spoken, then sign up to carry on with the other 14 minutes for 2 Listens.
Denzai's Rating: 7.3 of 10
Relevance 7.5 · Facts no claim checked · Interest 7.0
What a complete answer covers
The standard set before the show, and how Denzai judged each part was met.
- ✓ covered Who Holds the Pen Today
- ✓ covered Brazil Has Done This Before
- ◐ partly Germany, Italy, Argentina, Hungary Compared
- ◐ partly What Research Says About Terms
- ✓ covered The Case Against Changing Anything
- ◐ partly Timing, Transition, and the First Step
The fact desk
The fact desk checked 2 claims made on air: 0 supported, 0 contradicted, 2 unverified.
More ChatShows
More on Democracy. All of them in the Gallery.
- Who Should Decide on Detroit's Proposed Wealth Tax, and Who Can Stop It 3 heads · 15 min · 8.2
- Spain's Wealth and Corporate Tax Reform: Keep Revenue, Avoid Flight 3 heads · 15 min · 7.8
- Who Pays the Reporters: Platform Money, Levies and Local News in Canada 4 heads · 25 min · 5.9!
- Expanding Canada's Housing Benefit: Cash, Supply and Who Pays 4 heads · 15 min · 6.8!